In the experience of the forum, what is the best (most effective and most efficient) way to light a system?
I'm a teacher and permaculture designer working at a high school in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (JP Permaculture).
Roughly a year ago, we built a 1300L flood and drain system in the school's culinary arts room and are using a large 1500W cfl to light it (with mixed results). We are, however, planning an expansion (adding 70 square feet of grow bed) and are going to need some better lighting options. I have been considering LED's but they are expensive, I have access to virtually free sodium lights but they are energy hogs.
In the experience of the forum, what is the best (most effective and most efficient) way to light a system?
Tags:
The most effective and the most efficient way to light a system IMO, is the Sun . In second place are HID's. (MH, HPS, CMH...with CMH (ceramic metal halide) in all likelihood the best of the bunch. Watt per Watt, dollar for dollar HID's are the cheapest, most effective, easiest to maintain etc...
When you say "sodium lights" can you be more specific, since there are different types...HPS (high pressure sodium) are great, while say LPS (low pressure sodium) really suck as they are virtually monochromatic...CFL's are about the worst, for a number of reasons) IMO...(unless we count PL-lighting as a CFL...which technically it is...http://community.theaquaponicsource.com/group/artificiallighting/fo...)
There is a whole group here for all things artificial lighting http://community.theaquaponicsource.com/group/artificiallighting?
That you can check out/join...
And you can use the "search" field as well, since there have been many, many discussions on the topic (T-5 vs. HID cost to own blablabla...ones like this thread http://community.theaquaponicsource.com/forum/topics/nutrition-in-p...
Hope some of this helps...
Hi Dustin, the answer depends on what your goals are...
I spent the last several months growing with induction fluorescent lamps (link 1: lettuce, link 2: tomatoes), which can last 10+ years and keep the majority of the initial lumen output for most of it's lifespan. They definitely have their pros and cons depending on the design. They are also pricey, so the ROI will take awhile, and in 10 years who knows what advancements will be made that will make these and other lights obsolete.
HIDs have had my vote through many years of horticultural light trials. If you're referring to photons/lumens per watt, re: "bang for the buck", and stay in the 400w and above range this is your best option. With air, or better still, water cooled lighting you can make HIDs work in just about any space large or small in my experience. Ceramic Metal Halide HIDs are very attractive, and I hope to start playing with at least one CMH lamp soon.
T5 fluorescent does well, although it will produce less photons per watt than HIDs. Don't buy into the 'T5's are cooler' schpeel ... the laws of physics haven't been broken here
Reflector choice is critical when using Induction, HID, or T5.
All of the LEDs I've tested either weren't worth the time it took to hang them, or performed well enough so long as they were used to grow vegetative plants no taller than 4-6 inches.
Oh, and last thing, Vlad's correct- the sun is your best source as long as it's there and not blocked by intense cloud cover, which many places are during late fall, winter. and early spring. Shorter days are also a big factor. I've grown in greenhouses and indoor systems alike for many years, and until I have the time and money to build an adequately insulated greenhouse with an efficient heating/cooling system, I prefer the indoor approach.
© 2024 Created by Sylvia Bernstein. Powered by