Question....did you remove that little filter sponge on the pump? You'll want to take that thing off.
My thoughts exactly Jeff :)
Jeff S said:
I've been told, and have done this myself, to take out the mesh filter in the pump (if there is one). I've never had a pump problem since I did that. But it wouldn't hurt for you to get a 300-400 gph pump for proper flow.
Way overkill. He would need to bypass a lot of the water. You only need to cycle the water 1-2 times an hour so a 300-400 gph pump would work depending on the head height you're working with. In my system I worry more about higher head height than gph because I have an in ground sump.
Others may disagree but below is my $0.02...
In my 25 years of experience keeping fish on both a hobby, excessive crazy hobby (90 tanks - 1500 total gallons), and commercial production the more turnovers in the FISHTANK per hour the better, anything more than 2 and less than 6 is practical. Two turnovers is okay for light stocking density. On the upper end it comes down to energy exertion by the fish - if they are swimming hard all day they are burning more calories and not growing as quickly - also species matters (e.g. trout vs. tilapia). This does not always jive with the requirements of the hydroponic component. This becomes more and more apparent as systems increase in size especially when larger tanks and/or higher stocking densities are utilized. I will use the example of a 3-tote IBC system.
Fish Tank Volume - 250g --> x 3 turnovers per hour = 750gph
3 grow beds 100 gallons each w/ 40% void ratio cycling every 20 minutes = 300g x 40% x 3 = 360gph
Ideal fish flow is greater than growbed requirements. There a few ways to work this.
Of these I prefer #1 & #4 because I feel that either reduce fish or provide back-up biofiltration as a system component as good practice. For small systems getting extravagent is not necessary as maintenance is manageable, but increases in size require increased "simple" complexity to keep things manageable. Read "simple" complexity to mean passive methods whenever possible.
Good explanation Scott. Makes sense.